Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Greenhouses Gone Vertical?

I came across a news story a couple days ago about Plantagon, a Swedish-based company that's in the midst of developing a vertical greenhouse designed specifically to be built in the middle of crowded cities where land isn't exactly plentiful.

As if growing in standard horizontal greenhouses isn't difficult enough!

The idea of a vertical greenhouse for cities intrigues me, though, as do other greenhouse projects that seem out of this world (i.e. building a greenhouse on the moon). According to the story I found, an inventor came up with the vertical greenhouse idea 20 years ago, but he was essentially laughed at and turned away everywhere he pitched it. Ten years ago, the inventor pitched it to Plantagon vice president Hans Hassle, who made a commitment to build vertically.

Now, Plantagon is peddling the vertical greenhouse as the urban marketplace where urban dwellers (i.e. consumers) can buy their fruits and vegetables.

I'm not as familiar with the European landscape, for which vertical greenhouses are probably better suited, but I can't imagine any U.S. cities seriously considering construction of an vertical greenhouse -- particularly for the $30 million price tag each installation would cost.

A first impression of the major U.S. cities nearest me (Cleveland, Detroit, Columbus, Cincinnati) is they're not as suitable for comfortable living as the suburbs or rural areas. Cleveland's population has declined dramatically in recent years. People are moving to the suburbs and are subsequently getting their fruits and vegetables from grocery stores or local markets. One massive grower-retailer here doesn't make sense. I'd be curious to see how fruits and veggies from one massive grower-retailer in cities were priced.

3 comments:

  1. It is not clear if this greenhouse it to be used to GROW the vegetables and fruits, as opposed to simply being the location of the "urban marketplace". At least from the photo, growing seems to not be the real objective.

    If it IS for GROWING food, I fear people will starve, or at least will not be able to afford any food that might be produced in one.

    If it is for enclosing or defining an "urban marketspace", is might successfully do this (as do many conservatories, which are essentially the same as this). It could be a very nice and relaxing environment, an inspiring space and certainly a local or tourist destination. No problem there.

    But, as a marketplace per se (where, presumably, sustainability would be the watchword), no way....

    Sorry to be so pessimistic.

    Bill Miller
    wbm8@cornell.edu

    ReplyDelete
  2. I absolutely see this greenhouse working in Chicago. It's a very green city & getting greener by the day. Who wouldn't want to have fresh, local produce with a (seemingly) small footprint. Glad to be the optimist here. Let's get it going.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Author
    I have enjoyed reading.
    Nice blog.
    I will keep visiting this blog very often.

    ReplyDelete